Neurology

Alzheimer's Disease

Advertisement

Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease

clinical topic updates by Vijay K. Ramanan, MD, PhD
Overview
<p>Genetic factors play a role in the development of both early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In rare cases, a genetic factor can directly cause AD. Other genes have been identified that can influence the risk of developing AD.</p>
“The strongest known genetic risk factor for sporadic (ie, not familial) AD is the APOE4 allele. If someone has 1 copy of the APOE4 allele, their risk of developing AD is 2 to 4 times higher, and having 2 copies of the APOE4 allele increases their risk by more than 10 times compared with having 2 copies of the APOEε3 allele.”
— Vijay K. Ramanan, MD, PhD

AD is influenced by genetics, but there are many details that add context to that. Although relatively rare, early-onset AD affects patients younger than age 65, including some individuals as young as in their late 30s or early 40s. In approximately 1% or fewer of AD cases, a genetic mutation in the PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP gene directly causes the disease, often with a very early age of onset and a familial pattern. There may be additional causal mutations for early-onset AD that have not been identified yet. For most AD cases, however, genetic factors do not directly cause the disease but may increase or decrease the risk of developing it, alongside influences from environmental and lifestyle factors.

<br>

The strongest known genetic risk factor for sporadic (ie, not familial) AD is the APOEɛ4 (APOE4) allele. If someone has 1 copy of the APOE4 allele, their risk of developing AD is 2 to 4 times higher, and having 2 copies of the APOE4 allele increases their risk by more than 10 times compared with having 2 copies of the APOEε3 allele. However, the APOE4 allele alone is not necessary or sufficient to cause AD or cognitive impairment more generally. In fact, some individuals can have 2 copies of the APOE4 allele and remain cognitively intact throughout the course of their lives. Conversely, patients can develop AD without having an APOE4 allele.

<br>

Currently, we do not recommend testing for APOE alleles as part of the diagnostic process, since the presence or absence of APOE4 does not meaningfully indicate whether a given patient has AD vs another cause of cognitive impairment. We also do not recommend APOE testing for future risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals, primarily because the results would not alter clinical management at this time. Familiar lifestyle and other approaches to promote brain health are applicable regardless of someone’s APOE status. We now test for APOE allele status when anti-amyloid therapies are being considered for early AD because the presence of APOE4 is associated with a higher risk of side effects (known as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, or ARIA) with those therapies.

<br>

Beyond APOE4, studies have compared the genetic profiles of large numbers of individuals diagnosed clinically with probable AD against those without a cognitive diagnosis. These studies have identified additional genetic factors associated with AD risk, typically with fairly modest effect sizes in isolation. An increasing number of genetic variants is being discovered through research, and ongoing work is evaluating how to combine the collective effects of these variants into polygenic risk scores. I can envision a future in which knowing a person’s overall genetic risk for developing AD could potentially help guide the use of medication to prevent or delay AD development or help guide entry into a clinical trial. However, there are many steps of further research required to get to that point.

References

de Rojas I, Moreno-Grau S, Tesi N, et al. Common variants in Alzheimer’s disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3417. Published correction appears in Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):716.

<br>

Karagas N, Young JE, Blue EE, Jayadev S. The spectrum of genetic risk in Alzheimer disease. Neurol Genet. 2025;11(1):e200224. doi:10.1212/NXG.0000000000200224

<br>

Koutsodendris N, Nelson MR, Rao A, Huang Y. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease: findings, hypotheses, and potential mechanisms. Annu Rev Pathol. 2022;17:73-99. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-030421-112756

<br>

Kunkle BW, Grenier-Boley B, Sims R, et al; Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI), Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE), Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, Polygenic and Environmental Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium (GERAD/PERADES). Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat Genet. 2019;51(3):414-430. Published correction appears in Nat Genet. 2019;51(9):1423-1424.

<br>

Lambert JC, Ramirez A, Grenier-Boley B, Bellenguez C. Step by step: towards a better understanding of the genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(7):2716-2727. doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02076-1

<br>

Sirkis DW, Bonham LW, Johnson TP, La Joie R, Yokoyama JS. Dissecting the clinical heterogeneity of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(6):2674-2688. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01531-9

<br>

Wightman DP, Jansen IE, Savage JE, et al. A genome-wide association study with 1,126,563 individuals identifies new risk loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2021;53(9):1276-1282. Published corrections appear in Nat Genet. 2021;53(12):1722 and Nat Genet. 2022;54(7):1062.

Vijay K. Ramanan, MD, PhD

    Consultant, Division of Cognitive/Behavioral Neurology
    Director, Alzheimer's Disease Treatment Clinic
    Associate Professor
    Department of Neurology
    Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, MN
Advertisement