Allergy & Immunology

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Advertisement

Treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Response Characteristics in Focus

patient care perspectives by Allen P. Kaplan, MD
Overview

Rapidly identifying H1 antihistamine nonresponders is central to managing chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Dose escalation quickly clarifies refractoriness and allows the timely transition to omalizumab or to newer agents such as dupilumab and remibrutinib, each of which offers distinct response rates and trajectories. Minimizing the use of cyclosporine because of its safety profile is an important treatment goal, with its use increasingly reserved for patients who do not respond to recommended treatment options.

Expert Commentary
“The overwhelming majority of patients with CSU can be treated successfully with available therapies following the latest guideline-directed approach.”
— Allen P. Kaplan, MD

The latest international guideline states that the treatment of CSU should begin with second-generation H1 antihistamines at the standard dose level, and if the patient is not responsive, you can go as high as 4 times the standard dose to achieve response. The guideline does not instruct on how rapidly to increase the H1 antihistamine dose, but my opinion is that it should be done quickly. In fact, if the patient presents with significant symptoms, I may go ahead and start the H1 antihistamine at 4 times the standard dose instead of increasing the dose over time. If this works and their hives stop, then you can gradually decrease the H1 antihistamine dose. If this does not work, you then know that the patient is refractory to antihistamines, and you have saved a lot of time. More than 50% of patients with CSU are not going to respond to antihistamines, even at the increased doses.

 

For patients who do not respond to H1 antihistamines alone, step 2 in the guideline is to begin omalizumab therapy. In CSU, we have 2 standard dose options for omalizumab: either 150 or 300 mg once a month by injection. Approximately 40% of H1 antihistamine–resistant patients achieve complete disease control and 65% to 70% have a significant response, as assessed by both the Urticaria Control Test (UCT) score and the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7). For patients with a partial response, that response may continue to increase over time, or you can consider increasing the dose or increasing the dosing frequency, although insurance coverage for this approach may be difficult.

 

You can treat the majority of patients with CSU with H1 antihistamines or omalizumab. However, for people who are refractory to both, we now have 2 additional therapy choices: dupilumab and remibrutinib. In the latest guideline, dupilumab and remibrutinib are conditionally recommended to treat patients who experience omalizumab failure or to avoid using cyclosporine. The response rate with omalizumab is better than that with dupilumab, so I would choose omalizumab first. Remibrutinib is a BTK inhibitor, which is a totally new approach to managing CSU. It has a high response rate in patients who are unresponsive to antihistamines alone. Remibrutinib is taken orally rather than through injection, and its side effects are minimal.

 

If you follow the guideline, the next drug that is recommended, particularly after H1 antihistamine and omalizumab nonresponse, is cyclosporine. Cyclosporine also demonstrates good efficacy in combination with H1 antihistamines, but it has significant safety concerns, such as its effects on blood pressure and kidney function.

 

The overwhelming majority of patients with CSU can be treated successfully with available therapies following the latest guideline-directed approach. There is still a need for other drugs for refractory patients, and we would like to minimize the use of cyclosporine in the future.

References

Casale TB, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Bernstein JA, Holden M, Zuberbier T, Maurer M. Omalizumab for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a narrative review of current status. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023;13(11):2573-2588. doi:10.1007/s13555-023-01040-9

 

Giménez-Arnau AM, Szalewski R, Hide M, et al. Remibrutinib in chronic spontaneous urticaria: 52-week results from two phase 3 studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026;157(1):143-154. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2025.09.028

 

Kocatürk E, Chu DK, Türk M, et al. Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria made practical: what every clinician should know. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025;13(9):2252-2269. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.021

 

Min TK, Saini SS. The future of targeted therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024;133(4):367-373. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2024.05.020

 

Saini SS, Bindslev-Jensen C, Maurer M, et al. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamines: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(1):67-75. Published correction appears in J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(3):925.

 

Xiang YK, Fok JS, Podder I, et al. An update on the use of antihistamines in managing chronic urticaria. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2024;25(5):551-569. doi:10.1080/14656566.2024.2345731

 

Zuberbier T, Abdul Hameed Ansari Z, Abdul Latiff AH, et al. The international guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria. Allergy. Published online February 6, 2026. doi:10.1111/all.70210

Allen P. Kaplan, MD

    Professor
    Department of Medicine
    Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, SC
Advertisement