Psychiatry

Major Depressive Disorder

Advertisement

Treatment of Cognitive Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder

clinical study insights by Joseph F. Goldberg, MD

Overview

Clinical Study Title: Treatment of Neurocognitive Symptoms in Unipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

Clinical Study Abstract: The constellation of symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) includes cognitive deficits that may be persistent and commonly entail neurocognitive impairment and a decline in quality of life. Salagre et al conducted a systematic review of the current scientific evidence on therapeutic strategies for neuropsychological impairment in MDD using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Clinicaltrials.gov in December 2016 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and guidelines from the Cochrane Collaboration. A total of 95 studies reporting data on 40 pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions were included in their analysis. Interventions were grouped into the following categories: pharmacological therapies, physical therapies, psychological therapies, and exercise. Some promising compounds showing a positive impact on cognitive symptoms were identified, including: vortioxetine, lisdexamfetamine, or erythropoietin. The studies included, however, had significant methodological differences and sample heterogeneity. The lack of a standardized neuropsychological battery made comparisons between studies difficult. The authors concluded that, although current evidence is limited regarding the use of procognitive treatments in MDD, promising results are coming to light.

Reference: Salagre E, Solé B, Tomioka Y, et el. Treatment of neurocognitive symptoms in unipolar depression: a systematic review and future perspectives. J Affect Disord. 2017;221:205-221.

Expert Commentary

Joseph F. Goldberg, MD 

Clinical Professor of Psychiatry Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai New York, NY

“There are some data with vortioxetine showing ‒ presumably via 5-HT7, but we don’t know if that’s the case for sure ‒ that the molecule itself seems to exert a benefit on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test in attentional processing and psychomotor speed, independent of its effect on depression.” 

Joseph F. Goldberg, MD

In the present systematic review, Salagre and colleagues examined evidence for the treatment of neurocognitive symptoms in depression, only including studies in their analysis that had explored changes in cognitive performance as primary or secondary outcomes in adults with diagnosed MDD. A total of 95 studies were identified, and a succinct overview of the evidence presented follows.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on cognition can be viewed conveniently through the lens of patient age: in the elderly, most of the studies failed to find significant effects of SSRIs on cognition; however, positive results in younger patients with MDD have been reported. Effects of serotoninergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) on cognition have been demonstrated in several studies. Improvements in cognitive performance in domains like executive function, verbal learning, attention, working memory, or verbal processing speed have been shown with duloxetine. Additionally, improvements driven by improved verbal learning and memory have also been shown in an elderly population (median age, 72 years; range 65-90 years) with duloxetine. Effects of vortioxetine, a serotonin modulator and stimulator (SMS), on cognition have been investigated in several studies. Vortioxetine is used to treat MDD. In addition, improvement of cognitive dysfunction in patients with unipolar major depression may be greater with vortioxetine than other antidepressants (eg, duloxetine), and this benefit may be independent of depressive symptom improvement. Vortioxetine appears to enhance serotonergic activity through inhibition of the reuptake of serotonin (5-HT), and it also has several other activities including 5-HT3 receptor antagonism and 5-HT1A-receptor agonism, although the contribution of these activities to the antidepressant effect of vortioxetine has not been established. Other pharmacologic activity with vortioxetine has also been described. The 5HT-7 antagonists include vortioxetine, lurasidone, and asenapine. There, too, it’s been an area more of preclinical than clinical interest, with the exception of vortioxetine. There are some data with vortioxetine showing ‒ presumably via 5-HT7, but we don’t know if that’s the case for sure ‒ that the molecule itself seems to exert a benefit on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test in attentional processing and psychomotor speed, independent of its effect on depression. 

A recent meta-analysis found that patients with moderate to severe MDD receiving vortioxetine 5-20 mg performed significantly better than the placebo or duloxetine groups, regardless of dosage, in tests assessing executive function and attention and also learning and memory. Improvements in cognition were accompanied by an improvement in functional capacity.

Vortioxetine seems to have a multi-domain beneficial effect on cognitive performance, and these effects seem to be independent of its effect on depressive symptoms. Ongoing clinical trials will provide further data on the effect of vortioxetine on cognition.

References

Clark M, DiBenedetti D, Perez V, et al. Cognitive dysfunction and work productivity in major depressive disorder. Expert Rev Pharm Outcomes Res. 2016;16:455-463.

Harrison JE, Lophaven S, Olsen CK. Which cognitive domains are improved by treatment with vortioxetine? Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19(10):pyw054.

Hasselbalch BJ, Knorr U, Kessing LV. Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:20-31.

Herrera-Guzman I, Herrera-Abarca JE, Gudayol-Ferre E, et al. Effects of selective serotonin reuptake and dual serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake treatments on attention and executive functions in patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2010;177:323-329.

Katona C, Hansen T, Olsen CK. A randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled, duloxetine-referenced, fixed-dose study comparing the efficacy and safety of Lu AA21004 in elderly patients with major depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;27:215-223.

Mahableshwarkar AR, Zajecka J, Jacobson W, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, active-reference, double-blind, flexible-dose study of the efficacy of vortioxetine on cognitive function in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:2025-2037.

McIntyre R, Harrison J, Loft H, et al. The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19(10):pyw055.

McIntyre RS, Lophaven S, Olsen CK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:1557-1567.

Raskin J, Wiltse CG, Siegal A, et al. Efficacy of duloxetine on cognition, depression, and pain in elderly patients with major depressive disorder: an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:900-909.

Thase, ME, Mahableshwarkar AR, Dragheim M, et al. A meta- analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;26(6): 979-993.

Wroolie TE, Williams KE, Keller J, et al. Mood and neuropsychological changes in women with midlife depression treated with escitalopram. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;26:361-366.

Joseph F. Goldberg, MD

Clinical Professor of Psychiatry
Icahn School of Medicine
Mount Sinai
New York, NY

Advertisement