Psychiatry

Major Depressive Disorder

Advertisement

Clinical Topic Updates Podcast: The Evolution of Diagnostic Biomarkers and Neuroimaging in Depression

clinical topic updates by Charles DeBattista, MD
Overview

Despite decades of ongoing research, depression still lacks the widespread availability of reliable biomarkers to help guide diagnosis and treatment. Neuroimaging shows promise but remains impractical due to issues related to cost and access. Pharmacogenomic testing may offer only modest benefit for predicting treatment response, but it may be more useful for determining metabolism and toxicity risk. Inflammatory biomarkers have shown mixed results. As noted in today’s podcast, combining information from multiple types of biomarkers may hold the most promise for helping to predict patient outcomes.

 

References

Greden JF, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, et al. Impact of pharmacogenomics on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder in the GUIDED trial: a large, patient- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled study. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;111:59-67. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.01.003

 

Oslin DW, Lynch KG, Shih MC, et al. Effect of pharmacogenomic testing for drug-gene interactions on medication selection and remission of symptoms in major depressive disorder: the PRIME Care randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328(2):151-161. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.9805

 

Trivedi MH, McGrath PJ, Fava M, et al. Establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response in clinical care (EMBARC): rationale and design. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;78:11-23. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.03.001

 

Williams LM, Rush AJ, Koslow SH, et al. International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment for Depression (iSPOT-D), a randomized clinical trial: rationale and protocol. Trials. 2011;12:4. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-4

Charles DeBattista, MD

Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, CA

Advertisement