Oncology
Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease
Principles of Multispecialty Care for Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease
Overview
Patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) benefit from integrated care and specialists who are experienced with their particular needs. Skin involvement is perhaps the most common clinical manifestation of cGVHD, but any organ system can be affected.
Expert Commentary
Daniel R. Couriel, MD, MS
|
|
“I am a firm believer in the multidisciplinary care setting as a model, owing to both the complexity and the rarity of cGVHD.”
Having become involved in cGVHD and its treatment a long time ago at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, then later at the University of Michigan, and now here at the University of Utah, I am a firm believer in the multidisciplinary care setting as a model, owing to both the complexity and the rarity of cGVHD. Individuals with cGVHD need to be treated in an environment with providers who have a lot of experience with this disease.
That environment might include not only an oncologist but also an ophthalmologist, a dermatologist, a pulmonologist, a rheumatologist, a gynecologist, a physical therapist, and many other providers who are experienced with the very particular needs of these patients. We are fortunate to have such resources, including an extraordinary physical therapy group and a physical therapist who is allocated to our blood and marrow transplant group. Additionally, once per week, we work with the physical rehabilitation group that does consultations with people who require assistance beyond physical therapy.
Another consideration is that, without a system to integrate such care, patients are at risk for delays in treatment that can have serious consequences. Consider a patient with cGVHD who has recently been discharged, begins to experience dry eye, and goes to a local eye doctor who is not familiar with GVHD-related eye disorders. If you are fortunate and the patient’s ophthalmologist calls you right away, then you have been alerted and can act on the problem. But we all know that communication channels in health care do not always work optimally. Whether acute or chronic, GVHD is a very time-sensitive condition, and delays in appropriate treatment can have serious consequences for patients. The patient with GVHD you see today is not the patient you will see in 6 months, and delays can result in a missed window of opportunity.
I would also venture to say that having the right infrastructure to perform allogeneic transplantations should also mean having the infrastructure for GVHD care, because approximately one-half of your patients will develop GVHD. Transplants cause morbidity, and centers should be equipped to handle transplant-associated morbidity. The more experience you have as a multidisciplinary team, the better the care you provide for your patients.
References
Hashmi SK, Bredeson C, Duarte RF, et al. National Institutes of Health blood and marrow transplant late effects initiative: the Healthcare Delivery Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(5):717-725. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.025
Hymes SR, Alousi AM, Cowen EW. Graft-versus-host disease: part II. Management of cutaneous graft-versus-host disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(4):535.e1-e16. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.961
Lee SJ, Wolff D, Kitko C, et al. Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(6):984-999. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.02.025
Pidala J, Kurland B, Chai X, et al. Patient-reported quality of life is associated with severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease as measured by NIH criteria: report on baseline data from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood. 2011;117(17):4651-4657. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-11-319509



