Oncology

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

Advertisement

Dermatologic Manifestations of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

patient care perspectives by Sergio A. Giralt, MD

Overview

Dermatologic manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) are very common and range in severity from mild to severe forms. Higher doses of systemic steroids may be needed to achieve control in some cases, while steroid-sparing strategies should be considered to limit the long-term side effects of these agents.

Expert Commentary

Sergio A. Giralt, MD 

Deputy Division Head Division of Hematologic Malignancies Melvin Berlin Family Chair in Multiple Myeloma Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY

“The skin is one of the most important targets for GVHD, both acute and chronic, and it is the first and most frequently affected organ.”

Sergio A. Giralt, MD

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is potentially curative for various disorders, it carries the risk of GVHD. Patients who do not have an HLA-matched donor are at higher risk for GVHD, but they can still potentially undergo transplantation with strategies that are intended to mitigate this risk. In general, those with more severe, grade 3 or 4, acute GVHD are more likely to develop cGVHD, and these patients will invariably have some form of skin or mucosal manifestation. The skin is one of the most important targets for GVHD, both acute and chronic, and it is the first and most frequently affected organ.  

cGVHD often presents as areas of skin disturbance, sometimes as very specific itching and dryness of the skin and other times as just thickening of the skin at the places of pressure, such as where a belt or a bra strap goes. You can see the development of morphea-type scleroderma or thickening of the skin when it becomes leathery in those areas. There are a variety of diagnostic pathologic findings, including poikiloderma of Civatte, lichen planus, and scleroderma-type skin changes that can be seen with cGVHD. The oral and vaginal mucosae can be considered as, essentially, extensions of the skin, and many patients develop mucosal ulcerations in addition to having skin involvement. 

For many mild manifestations, such as a mild limited rash, local treatments may be needed. For more severe manifestations or for disseminated manifestations, however, systemic immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies may be essential. Clinicians can consider some form of topical therapy that will serve to spare the patient from receiving systemic therapy, such as steroids. Although steroids are effective, they can cause significant problems for patients in the long-term, including infections, which are a major cause of death in patients with cGVHD. In those who are requiring high doses of steroids to maintain disease control, serious consideration should be given to adding one of the second-line agents, such as ruxolitinib, belumosudil, or ibrutinib, as a steroid-sparing strategy to try to reduce the long-term side effects of these agents. 

Chronic steroid use is also associated with dermatologic toxicities such as skin thinning and ecchymosis. This can cause skin breakdown and predispose patients to infections. Proper education of patients and caregivers and prompt attention to skin breakdown are important aspects in healthy skin management, as is continued dermatologic screening for skin cancers. Patients who have had a transplant have a higher risk of developing secondary skin cancers, and they should be monitored appropriately. These individuals should be careful with sun exposure because there are many medications that produce photosensitivity, and this increases their risk of developing certain skin cancers.

References

Baumrin E, Baker LX, Byrne M, et al. Prognostic value of cutaneous disease severity estimates on survival outcomes in patients with chronic graft-vs-host disease. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(4):393-402. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6624

Campbell J, Gavin N, Button E, Roberts N. Skin and wound care for individuals with graft versus host disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e038567. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038567

Da Silva JAP, Jacobs JWG, Kirwan JR, et al. Safety of low dose glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: published evidence and prospective trial data. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(3):285-293. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.038638

Guerra R, Saavedra AP. Dermatologic manifestations of graft versus host disease. Medscape. Updated June 10, 2021. Accessed July 30, 2023. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1050580-overview

Link-Rachner CS, Sockel K, Schuetz C. Established and emerging treatments of skin GvHD. Front Immunol. 2022;13:838494. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.838494

Martin PJ, Lee SJ, Przepiorka D, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: VI. The 2014 Clinical Trial Design Working Group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(8):1343-1359. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.004

Petersdorf EW. Role of major histocompatibility complex variation in graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation. F1000Res. 2017;6:617. doi:10.12688/f1000research.10990.1

Rambhia PH, Conic RZ, Atanaskova-Mesinkovska N, Piliang M, Bergfeld WF. Role of graft-versus-host disease in the development of secondary skin cancers in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(2):378-380.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.012

Sergio A. Giralt, MD

Deputy Division Head
Division of Hematologic Malignancies
Melvin Berlin Family Chair in Multiple Myeloma
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, NY

Advertisement