Rheumatology
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Latest DMARD Prescribing Trends for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States
Overview
Methotrexate (MTX) remains the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy; however, there have been changes in the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in recent years. Patients with inadequate responses to MTX are increasingly interested in non–tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) RA therapies, and MTX-intolerant patients have more options for monotherapy.
Expert Commentary
Leonard H. Calabrese, DO
|
|
“People are beginning to liberalize their choices when their response to MTX has been inadequate to include non-TNF alternatives and the new oral targeted synthetic agents.”
The most recent American College of Rheumatology guidelines for the management of RA were published in 2016, and they are in need of an update, which is expected in the fall of 2020. The recent European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are more in line with current practice. MTX remains the cornerstone of therapy for most patients with RA; however, we are seeing more biologic monotherapy. Additionally, I think that people are beginning to liberalize their choices when their response to MTX has been inadequate to include non-TNF alternatives and the new oral targeted synthetic agents. Sullivan et al recently reported that TNFi cycling was seen in more than half of patients after a TNFi failure, but those data were collected between Q2 and Q3 2016 and much has changed since then. So, we are still generally MTX-centric, but an increasing number of patients are on either a biologic or a targeted synthetic DMARD. Approximately one-third of individuals with RA are not on MTX for a variety of reasons, including intolerance and contraindication, and we see no less of that.
Treatment considerations include efficacy, safety profiles, the individual patient’s systemic manifestations, and patient preferences. So, for example, there is some thought that patients with diverticulitis are not good candidates for interleukin-6 or Janus kinase inhibitors. Likewise, TNFi agents might be avoided in patients who are frail or have had a serious infection and are on prednisone. For those with anemia and fatigue, an interleukin-6 inhibitor may make sense. Or, when safety issues are a concern (eg, risk of hospitalized infection), one may gravitate toward abatacept. Our thinking on these distinct treatments is evolving based on the available data, but we do not yet have rich biomarkers to steer us toward one therapy or the other. There is also an increasing interest in oral options, which now include not only tofacitinib but also upadacitinib and baricitinib, with additional oral agents likely to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the next few months. So, this is a big change in the prescribing landscape.
References
Atzinger CB, Guo JJ. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in a national, privately insured population: utilization, expenditures, and price trends. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017;10(1):27-36.
Ozen G, Pedro S, Schumacher R, Simon TA, Michaud K. Safety of abatacept compared with other biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from an observational study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):141. doi:10.1186/s13075-019-1921-z
Rohr MK, Mikuls TR, Cohen SB, Thorne JC, O’Dell JR. Underuse of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a national analysis of prescribing practices in the US. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69(6):794-800. doi:10.1002/acr.23152
Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):685-699. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655
Sullivan E, Kershaw J, Blackburn S, Choi J, Curtis JR, Boklage S. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescription patterns for rheumatoid arthritis among United States physicians. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7(2):383-400. doi:10.1007/s40744-020-00203-w


