Rheumatology

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Advertisement

Managing Challenging Cases of Rheumatoid Arthritis

patient care perspectives by Vibeke Strand, MD, MACR, FACP

Overview

Cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that rheumatologists often find challenging to manage are those that have differing sets of obstacles and barriers that need to be overcome. Some challenges that may arise include numerous inadequate responses to multiple trials of RA therapy, with persistently active inflammatory disease that is difficult to control. Other difficulties may relate to central pain phenomena and intercurrent mood disorders with persistent pain and fatigue. With respect to mood disorders, and specifically depression in RA, there is reason to believe that patient-reported data can help to elucidate the barriers to treatment and optimize care.

Expert Commentary

Vibeke Strand, MD, MACR, FACP

Adjunct Clinical Professor, Division of Immunology/Rheumatology
Stanford University School of Medicine
Biopharmaceutical Consultant
Palo Alto, CA

“The strategy there is to keep trying, and you may have to change the medication every 3 to 4 months until control of really active inflammatory disease is achieved.” 

Vibeke Strand, MD

One scenario of a difficult-to-treat patient really comes from the active inflammatory disease. This could be a patient with RA who is started on the ladder of treatment advancement, beginning with methotrexate, then a biologic, and then required a change in biologic—perhaps even several changes in biologics—and then, possibly, a small molecule. That is a challenging case for a rheumatologist, and the strategy there is to keep trying, and you may have to change the medication every 3 to 4 months until control of really active inflammatory disease is achieved. 

Then there is the patient whose joints and other indices seem to be improving and getting under control, but in whom there may be an issue with central sensitization, causing pain that is more widespread and “fibromyalgia-like.” So, in this case, there is pain augmentation. The question is, do rheumatologists recognize this process as well as we should? In this type of case, the approach may be different in that it may require additional treatment modalities: some counseling, physical moves, motivation, mobilization, and, perhaps, some agents that act upon the central nervous system in an attempt to resolve those issues. 

If we consider excessive pain and fatigue and intercurrent mood disorders in RA, we know that mood disorders are reported in a higher frequency in patients with RA than in the general population. Patients with mood disorders and central pain may not track directly with core indices of tender and swollen joints and inflammation.

Another issue is that we often do not spend a lot of time talking to our patients about depression because we find individuals with RA to be quite robust and resilient. We have always known that, for some reason, they seem to be able to endure more issues than patients with other types of arthritis. So, what we have been looking at now is whether patients with depression respond similarly to those without depression. This involves the use of certain surrogate markers, such as the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, self-rated health, and health-related quality of life. We are just at the beginning of really trying to understand this, but it looks as if consistent responses in patient-reported data can be indicative of depression, and that these patients who we think may have depression are still able to respond just as well to RA therapy as other patients without depression or who may have less-severe depressive symptoms.

References

Bingham CO III, Bartlett SJ, Merkel PA, et al. Using patient-reported outcomes and PROMIS in research and clinical applications: experiences from the PCORI pilot projects. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(8):2109-2116.

Doss J, Mo H, Carroll RJ, Crofford LJ, Denny JC. Phenome-wide association study of rheumatoid arthritis subgroups identifies association between seronegative disease and fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(2):291-300.

Matcham F, Davies R, Hotopf M, et al. The relationship between depression and biologic treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(5):835-843.

Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1-26.

Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):960-977.

Strand V, Hagino O, Guillonneau S, et al. Depressive symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sarilumab TARGET and MOBILITY trials and impact of treatment. Poster presented at: EULAR 2018 Annual European Congress of Rheumatology; June 13-16, 2018; Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Strand V, Hagino O, Guillonneau S, et al. Impact of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and depressive symptoms in the MONARCH phase 3 trial of sarilumab. Poster presented at: EULAR 2018 Annual European Congress of Rheumatology; June 13-16, 2018; Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Vibeke Strand, MD, MACR, FACP

Adjunct Clinical Professor, Division of Immunology/Rheumatology
Stanford University School of Medicine
Biopharmaceutical Consultant
Palo Alto, CA

Advertisement